researchgate who viewed my profile
The higher their score, the more yours will increase. the idea behind the app is intreaguing & enticing ; not to mention it's beneficial in feeding a user's hunger to discover his/her secret peekers . By reverse engineering the score, they find that a significant weight is linked to impact points a similar metric to the widely discredited journal impact factor. It's also possible that some of your most frequent viewers are people you rarely interact with at all! I will gladly use your example as a slide in my lecture on data-driven management. Are my publications any good? LinkedIn - More professional than academic. ; university refuses to release data; collaboration's dark side - Retraction Watch at Retraction Watch, Impact of Social Sciences The ResearchGate Score: a good example of a bad metric | Flexibility Enables Learning, People asked to stay away from valleys - RiyadhVision, The ResearchGate Score: a good example of a bad metric | ceams-carsm blog. Facebook went through similar problems with privacy and has since improved. With such high aims, Peter Kraker,Katy Jordan andElisabeth Lex take a closer look at the opaque metric. 2. ResearchGate. Not accurate. You can always update it to create more exposure for your projects. IMHO, Google Scholar is a must, because the profile will make it easier to get updated on your other publications. A critical look at theResearchGateScore as a measure of scientific reputation. wikiHow is where trusted research and expert knowledge come together. Compare to his ResearchGate profile (I was even surprised he has one) - it's a dead duck, absolutely useless. It lures one in with an appeal to recognition of other authors who are friends or co-authors. The following are the detailed steps to do it. ResearchGATE | , #DeleteAcademicSocialNetworks ? It does an incredibly sloppy job of assembling information on scholars (e.g., catches only about 350 of my over 1000 citations at ISI and 3500 at Google Scholar and Hazing's Publish or Perrish). Now for the last 3 week, I been seeing the same 32, out of 4k friends and about 200-500, I know them. Other than that, I have the impression that ResearchGate is mostly used by students, not by established researchers. I finally feel like the site is going down the right path. By looking across a variety of indicators, supporting a centralised, interoperable metrics hub, and utilizing more theory in building metrics, scientists can better understand the diverse facets of research impact and research quality. Keep yourself updated with the latest technology and trends with TechPout. If you would like to disable invitations entirely, simply click Turn off all. There are still plenty of problems with the site. The results of our our evaluation of the RG Score were rather discouraging: while there are some innovative ideas in the way ResearchGate approached the measure, we also found that the RG Score ignores a number of fundamental bibliometric guidelines and that ResearchGate makes basic mistakes in the way the score is calculated. The US-based NISO Working Group on altmetrics has done a lot to help put altmetrics on a solid foundation, so I would just like to point out that one of their principles is also transparency and openness. Therefore, online networks such as Reddit have started to moderate downvotes. A ResearchGate profile is broken down into five tabs. Furthermore, the JIF is only available for journals; therefore it cannot be used to evaluate fields that favor other forms of communication, such as computer science (conference papers) or the humanities (books). Copyright 2023 www.techpout.com. Also Read: How To Recover Deleted Facebook Account. Finally, it should be pointed out that the RG Score is not the only bad metric out there. InStalker Reports is the only app you need to see hidden stories! So if you have any concerns with a certain metric, dont hesitate to share it with us, write about it or even nominate it for the Bad Metric prize. The higher the RG Scores of those who interact with your research, the more your own score will increase. Elisabeth Lex is assistant professor at Graz University of Technologyand she heads the Social Computing research area at Know-Center GmbH. As a result, the JIF is rather problematic when evaluating journals; when it comes to single contributions it is even more questionable. How to Recover Permanently Deleted Messages On Facebook Messenger, How to Report Someone on Facebook (Profiles, Pages, Comments, and More), How to Fix Unable to Determine Filesystem Type, How to Fix Kotion Each G2000 Mic Not Working (Easily), HP Spectre x360 Driver Download and Update, Windscribe VPN: A Complete Review with its All Features, How to Download Epson LX-310 Driver (For Free), Duplicate Photo Finder and Cleaner Software. data, slides) is definitely a step into the right direction, and the idea of considering interactions when thinking about academic reputation has some merit. It seems puzzling that a score that claims to be a new way to measure your scientific reputation would go down that way. At least, I can say that it gives me occasional joy when I see some view & download numbers on ResearchGate. Most highly significant findings are only recognised when re-visited, years after they were published. Also we should be able to see the past summary always. Previously, Facebook only allowed users to view only the number of profile views and not who viewed your profile. Scroll to the bottom of the screen and enter your unique ORCID iD. Below we address almost all the queries you may have about checking who viewed your profile. Launched in 2008, ResearchGate was one of the earlier academic social networks on the Web. But I immediately realised this would be an issue and disabled the setting. This is exemplified by, in ResearchGates own question and answering system pertaining to the exact calculation of the RG Score. We use cookies on this site to understand how you use our content, and to give you the best browsing experience. Are you wondering who your stalker is or perhaps an admirer viewing your Facebook profile? ResearchGate seems to have reacted to the criticisms surrounding the RG Score. Are My Suggested Friends People Who Looked at My Profile? At the same time, ResearchGate has decided to keep the score, albeit in a smaller role. There are several pieces of profile information which could potentially contribute to the score; at the time of the analysis, these included impact points (calculated using impact factors of the journals an individual has published in), downloads, views, questions, answers, followers and following. If you have turned off invitations, you can always turn them back on again by selecting Turn on all. Instead, put a lot of information on your homepage. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. . This is part of a series of pieces fromthe Quantifying and Analysing Scholarly Communication on the Web workshop. 5. The results were presented at a recent workshop on Analysing and Quantifying Scholarly Communication on the Web (ASCW15 introductory posthere) in a position paper and its discussion. Note: Number, email, and addresses are not visible until you . Looking at the pie charts of RG Score breakdowns, academics who have a RG Score on their profile can therefore be thought of as including several subgroups: those whose score is based only on their publications; scores based on question and answer activity; and scores based on a combination of any of the three. It may come as no surprise that this strategy has since been adopted by many of ResearchGates competitors, including Academia.edu and Mendeley. To customize who sees what, follow these steps: Go to your Privacy Settings Select the drop-down menu underneath the About you section Choose who can see your profile information by selecting. This turned me completely off, and I think it is simply a spam company. You may now go through the next section to clear any doubts or confusion you might have about how to see who views your Facebook profile. Further muddying the water, the algorithm used to calculate the RG Score is changing over time. So while some bad actors give a bad impression with their black box metrics, it would be unfortunate if people come away with the impression that all altmetrics from commercial platforms are closed and proprietary. , meaning that it says less and less about individual papers. It does not happen automatically. Therefore, online networks such as Reddit. Your email address will not be published. Im in an interdisciplinary social/medical science field where people publish in a very wide range of journals, and I try to keep track of several pieces of literature. Can I add friends if I am not logged in to Facebook? There is a wide consensus among researchers on this issue: the, San Francisco Declaration of Research Assessment (DORA). Browse other questions tagged, Start here for a quick overview of the site, Detailed answers to any questions you might have, Discuss the workings and policies of this site. Using whatever web browser you prefer to use on your computer, open Facebook.com. in the Settings of your Truecaller app. One doesn't know when it can be useful. Let's hope for the best. Select the option of a creator account. Name search: looked for your name in Truecaller. Good analysis, but theres a further problem with the RG score. I don't really think that ResearchGate is a waste of time. The algorithm and criteria included is not transparent so not clear how the final RG score is calculated. However, there is a mismatch between the goal of the RG Score and use of the site in practice. The platform revolves around research papers, a question and answering system, and a job board. The Leiden Manifesto states that metrics should be regularly scrutinized and updated, if needed. Impact points proved to be very relevant; for this exploratory sample at least, impact points accounted for a large proportion of the variation in the data (68%). The high number of messages prove to be very successful for ResearchGate: according to. There are some "hidden" settings that will repeatedly send out "Invitations" and even "Invitation reminders" to your peers (make sure to disable this right at signup time, before "claiming" a single paper!). It is frequently used to ask questions and to connect and collaborate with colleagues, peers, co-authors, and experts in your field as ResearchGate automatically helps you create a research network.This is based on the people . You may repeat the above steps to find all your profile viewers. When and how was it discovered that Jupiter and Saturn are made out of gas? While it may have succeeded in this department, we found several critical issues with the RG Score, which need to be addressed before it can be seen as a serious metric. - Follower Increase and Decrease (My secret followers, unfollowers) With follower analysis application InStalker Reports, you can instantly see the increase or decrease in the number of followers. % of people told us that this article helped them. As an example, we have plotted Peters RG Score from August 2012 to April 2015. Transparency in metrics is the only way scholarly measures can be put into context and the only way biases which are inherent in all socially created metrics can be uncovered. Analyse des RG-Score von researchgate.net | escienceblogging. ResearchGate. Currently, there is little exchange between the different communities interested in the domain of bibliometrics. In addition, the application also uses . Les rseaux sociaux acadmiques en 2016 | Digital library, Impact of Social Sciences Advancing to the next level: the quantified self and the gamification of academic research through social networks, The ResearchGate Score: a good example of a bad metric | carsten.io, Metrics, Metrics, (Alt)metrics | The New West, Impact of Social Sciences The ResearchGate Score rewards academics active participation on the platform above their publications and citations, Academic social networks/author profile systems | The Orb, First, Do No Harm: Five Tips for Collaborating With Government and Development Orgs - Social Science Space, Open Peer Review Not Always Welcomed With Open Arms - Social Science Space, Metrics for Measuring Research Outputs Dr Richard Huysmans. Updated weekly, the RG Score is a single number that is attached to a researchers profile. This program is considered the most popular among users of social networks. Furthermore, the score misses any activities that takes place outside of ResearchGate; for example, Twitter is more frequently the site for actively discussing research, ResearchGate seems to have reacted to the criticisms surrounding the RG Score. Its not and we continue to work with the DOI Event Tracker (DET) team at Crossref to make sure this will never be the case. Next, tap on your Account icon, scroll down and select more on your profile. With these developments in mind, it becomes even more important for us bibliometrics researchers to inform our stakeholders (such as funding agencies and university administrators) about the problems with individual metrics. I can't install Truecaller / rebooting phone takes a long time. | The Research Whisperer. My citation number in Google Scholar are in the thousand and in ResearchGate they shrink badly to less than 311. If you sign up (or are already signed up), make sure to carefully check all settings. There are several pieces of profile information which could potentially contribute to the score; at the time of the analysis, these included impact points (calculated using impact factors of the journals an individual has published in), downloads, views, questions, answers, followers and following. ResearchGate is a for-profit, professional network site for researchers and academics: TheRG Scoremeasures scientific reputation based on how your work is received by your peers. He seems to be keeping the list updated with new problems or improvements. 6. There are a number of interesting ideas in the RG Score: including research outputs other than papers (e.g. Dealing with hard questions during a software developer interview. The platform revolves around research papers, a question and answering system, and a job board. I don't think your question in this generality and broadness can be answered easily. This page contains your publications, questions, topics, awards and achievements, institutions, skills and expertise, and network. Premium and free version, what's the difference? A critical look at theResearchGateScore as a measure of scientific reputation. rev2023.3.1.43266. Please, it would be a vast improvement! Can create alerts for people, articles, and discussion boards, Makes recommendations on who to follow based on your citations, whose cited you, papers, who youfollow, top co-authors,and your area of research, Users report a lot of spam from ResearchGate, ResearchGate may also spam your connections and peers, Encourage people to post the full-text of their articles, even if that violates copyright, May include papers from predatory publishers that may also impact RG Score, Sends reminder emails to check status of your account and RG score. As the JIF is based on the mean number of citations, a single paper with a high number of citations can therefore, In addition, the correlation between JIF and individual citations to articles, has been steadily decreasing since the 1990s. Q2. ResearchGate makes it easy for you to add your publications as well as your unpublished work to your profile. The researcher has to be very careful to retain the scored RG value that has to be maintained forever rather than loosing the existing scores. Impact points proved to be very relevant; for this exploratory sample at least, impact points accounted for a large proportion of the variation in the data (68%). Peter is an open science advocate collaborating with the Open Knowledge Foundationand the Open Access Network Austria. Most of my colleagues and peers are now on the site, I see their citation updates and the metrics are improving. I've been using ResearchGate for about three years now. 1 person found this helpful https://sites.google.com/view/privacypolicy-wprofile/home. Find the users ID. If you do mistake in adding and deleting your information then by default the score will be automatically reduced. Updated weekly, the RG Score is a single number that is attached to a researchers profile. '. It's hard to predict how this will develop in the future. {"smallUrl":"https:\/\/www.wikihow.com\/images\/thumb\/a\/ab\/See-Who-Views-Your-Facebook-Profile-Step-1-Version-4.jpg\/v4-460px-See-Who-Views-Your-Facebook-Profile-Step-1-Version-4.jpg","bigUrl":"\/images\/thumb\/a\/ab\/See-Who-Views-Your-Facebook-Profile-Step-1-Version-4.jpg\/aid2904241-v4-728px-See-Who-Views-Your-Facebook-Profile-Step-1-Version-4.jpg","smallWidth":460,"smallHeight":345,"bigWidth":728,"bigHeight":546,"licensing":"